Skip to the main content.
Making screening easy for candidates

CVC - Mega Menu-01

With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.

See how it works ›

Featured resource

Industry-Trends-Report-01

Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.

Download the full report ›

Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Get to know us ›

Accredited background screening solutions

Logo-PBSA-Accreditation-120x98

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.

Learn about our solutions ›

1 min read

$54 Million Negligent Hiring Lawsuit Verdict Upheld

Avoiding risky hires takes more than just completing a background check to store in a candidate’s personnel file. It’s also essential to have policies and procedures in place with the help of trusted legal counsel to avoid hiring or retaining candidates that could put your business at risk.

In a recent case, an Illinois state appellate court affirmed a $54 million jury verdict against a trucking company. The case involved the negligent hiring and retention of a truck driver that, while on the job, was involved in a serious car accident that left a plaintiff with severe and permanent injuries.

According to court, the trucker’s driver’s qualification file, which included a background check, revealed that:

      • The trucker had never completed a truck driving course, even though he had a commercial driver’s license.
      • Within three years of his employment application, the trucker had been involved in four accidents, had three moving violations, and had his license suspended twice.
      • Four out of seven previous employers over the last ten years had terminated employment with the trucker.
      • In the seven years before his application, the trucker had been convicted of nine traffic-related offenses and four counts of felony reckless aggravated assault.

A safety coordinator testified that, based on the company’s safety standards, the trucker’s felony conviction would have automatically disqualified him from employment with the trucking company. The coordinator’s initial decision to reject this trucker’s application was overruled by a superior who admitted that the trucker was “…a marginal candidate” but that the company was “…forced to accept ‘marginal drivers’ in order to make a profit.”

Additionally, the trucker did not attend mandatory company safety training, had multiple moving violations, and had his license suspended within the first nine months of his employment. The company still retained the trucker, even though company policy would have revoked his driving privileges because the company “never ran his motor vehicle report or monitored his license…” after hiring.

This case should serve as a cautionary tale for employers. What are your guidelines for the use of background check information? It would help if you gave serious consideration to working with a trusted legal advisor to develop firm guidelines regarding the hiring and retention of employees and applicants based on your background checks. Maintaining a successful background screening program, with strict and well-identified policies and procedures for recruitment and retention, could help protect your company from negligent hiring claims and may help prevent tragedies like the accident that occurred in this case.

Virginia’s New Record Sealing Laws Give a Second Chance to Reformed Individuals

Earlier this year, we covered Kansas City’s efforts to expand employment protections for individuals with criminal histories. Meanwhile, Virginia has...

Read More

Amendments to the Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act Explained

Although other states and jurisdictions have implemented laws and regulations to address certain aspects of AI use in business scenarios, Colorado...

Read More

Minneapolis Takes Action to Strengthen Civil Rights Protections

In 2014, Minnesota implemented a “ban the box” law (Minnesota Statute 364.021) to help create a fairer hiring climate for Minnesotans with a criminal...

Read More

New York City Moves to Restrict Use of Certain Automated Hiring Technologies

Technology could help simplify the hiring process, including adopting new technologies to manage your candidate pool, run video interviews, and...

Read More

EEOC & DOJ Cautions Against Using AI to Make Employment Decisions

Artificial intelligence or AI continues to be a hot topic in HR. Seamless, touch-free use of complex hiring technologies has been the mark of a...

Read More

Waterloo, Iowa: The First Iowa Jurisdiction to “Ban the Box”

The “ban the box” movement – featuring laws that often prevent employers from asking about a candidate’s criminal history early in the hiring process...

Read More