Re-imaging a Fresh Start: The Details on Washington D.C.’s Second-Chance Amendment Act
Criminal justice reform and a road to second chances for those with a criminal past have gained powerful momentum across the United States in recent...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
|
|
Now offering DOT services!Get your drivers on the road quickly and meet DOT regulations. |
Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
2 min read
Verified Credentials Jun 1, 2023 12:00:00 AM
On April 24, 2023, the City of Chicago published an amended ban-the-box ordinance that limits the use of conviction and arrest records by employers. Below is an overview of the changes effective immediately.
The legal uses of arrest records to make decisions as an employer have been redefined, and the City’s amendment to Sections 6-10-020 and 6-10-054 of the Municipal Code of Chicago contains the following changes:
“(1) an arrest not leading to a conviction; (2) a juvenile record; or (3) criminal history record information ordered, expunged, sealed, or impounded under Section 5.2 of the Criminal Identification Act.”
The amendment also contains new guidelines about when a potential employer or employer may use conviction records as a basis making certain employment-related decisions, including a requirement to perform an individualized assessment in certain situations.
Potential employers and employers can only consider conviction records in making employment-related decisions:
In making the determinations regarding a substantial relationship or unreasonable risk, the potential employer or employer must perform an individualized assessment and consider the following factors:
Potential employers and employers must also provide a pre-adverse action notice and adverse action notice to any person subject to an adverse employment decision based on the person’s criminal history.
A potential employer or employer who wishes to take adverse employment action, in whole or in part, based on a person’s criminal history must first send a pre-adverse action notice that:
The potential employer or employer must consider the person’s response to a pre-adverse action notice, if any. If the potential employer or employer wishes to continue with the adverse employment action, then it must send an adverse action notice that identifies the disqualifying convictions, explains why the conviction(s) disqualify the person from employment, and states that the person has the right to file a charge with the Chicago Commission on Human Relations.
These requirements are in addition to other state and federal requirements applicable to pre-adverse and adverse action notices.
Verified maintains a resource library containing sample documents for our clients to use, including sample adverse and pre-adverse notices. Sample forms and documents should not be construed as legal advice, guidance, or counsel. Organizations should consult their own attorney about their compliance responsibilities under the FCRA and applicable state and local law.
Criminal justice reform and a road to second chances for those with a criminal past have gained powerful momentum across the United States in recent...
Data privacy has been a recurring hot topic this year, with Utah, Minnesota, Montana, and several others passing or updating legislation regarding...
Following a series of executive orders issued earlier this year, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a new internal...
We previously covered the appellate court decision in Cree, Inc. v. LIRC. After our last post, the case continued to move through the legal process....
We have highlighted several new ban the box laws at the local, state, and federal level. Another month brings a new ban the box law for you to...
Transportation service giants Uber and Lyft have faced a fair share of attention related to their drivers. Buckley v. Uber claim both rideshare...