2025 Updates to Form I-9 and E-Verify
On April 2, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) made adjustments to Form I-9. These revisions were made to ensure the form...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Ongoing monitoring of driving records can help employers avoid risk and improve driver safety. Learn about the benefits of adding Verified Credentials' newest solution to your screening strategy.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Verified Credentials Nov 18, 2020 12:00:00 AM
The state of California is a leader in the tech world. Silicon Valley is the global hub for technology innovation and startups. Many of the largest tech-based corporations even call this state home. But when it comes to ban the box laws, California was less advanced. The California Fair Chance Act has only been around for a couple of years – 20 years after the first law of its kind in Hawaii.
Beginning in 2018, California-based companies with five or more employees faced new restrictions. The state placed limits on how employers can use conviction history when evaluating applicants for employment during the hiring process.
The California Fair Chance Act says that employers cannot, among other things:
Employers must evaluate an applicant’s records one by one if they look at criminal history during the hiring process. The assessment should consider the:
The Fair Chance Act specifically protects job applicants. California was concerned that there could be potential loopholes with the law. For example, an employer could have an applicant start work before a post-offer criminal history review. At that time, they could have an “employee” status (even conditionally) with the employer. Then the job applicant could potentially lose their “applicant” status and protections provided by the Fair Chance Act.
Now the California Fair Employment and Housing Council has issued new regulations to address the potential loopholes. As of October 1, 2020, these Fair Chance Act regulations expand the definition of “applicant.” An “applicant” now includes anyone with a conditional offer of employment, but starts working while the employer performs a post-conditional offer review of criminal history.
The state hopes this will prevent employers from avoiding Fair Chance Act requirements.
The state’s Fair Employment and Housing Council wants to help employers understand the Fair Chance Act. Take a look at the Frequently Asked Questions for additional direction.
Do you still have more questions? Your legal counsel can help you understand how the California Fair Chance Act applies to you.
On April 2, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) made adjustments to Form I-9. These revisions were made to ensure the form...
On April 25, 2025, Mayor Lisa Brown of Spokane, Washington, signed Ordinance No. C36666, also known as the "Ban the Address" law. While "Ban the Box"...
Throughout this year, we have covered several state laws and updates implemented to protect consumer data privacy in New Jersey, Delaware, New...
On September 28, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 1100, an amendment toCalifornia’s Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA), introducing ...
A recent case, Doe v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, could spark further discussions on how California reports motor vehicle record checks. The...
It may be apparent to employers that any violation of employment law can result in consequences. Often, the law spells out potential penalties....