Skip to the main content.
Making screening easy for candidates

CVC - Mega Menu-01

With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.

See how it works ›

Featured resource

Adverse Action Guide_Menu

Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.

Visit the guide ›

Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Get to know us ›

Accredited background screening solutions

Logo-PBSA-Accreditation-120x98

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.

Learn about our solutions ›

1 min read

Innovating “Applicant”: Updates to California’s Ban the Box Law

The state of California is a leader in the tech world. Silicon Valley is the global hub for technology innovation and startups. Many of the largest tech-based corporations even call this state home. But when it comes to ban the box laws, California was less advanced. The California Fair Chance Act has only been around for a couple of years – 20 years after the first law of its kind in Hawaii.

How the State Joined the Movement

Beginning in 2018, California-based companies with five or more employees faced new restrictions. The state placed limits on how employers can use conviction history when evaluating applicants for employment during the hiring process.

The California Fair Chance Act says that employers cannot, among other things:

  • Ask applicants about criminal records on an employment application.
  • Ask or consider criminal history of any applicant until after making a conditional employment offer.
  • Consider an applicant’s sealed, dismissed, or expunged records.
  • Consider an applicant’s arrests without convictions or referrals to pre- or post-trial diversion programs.

Employers must evaluate an applicant’s records one by one if they look at criminal history during the hiring process. The assessment should consider the:

  • Nature and gravity of the offense
  • Time that has passed
  • Nature of the job

Reshaping Definitions

The Fair Chance Act specifically protects job applicants.  California was concerned that there could be potential loopholes with the law. For example, an employer could have an applicant start work before a post-offer criminal history review. At that time, they could have an “employee” status (even conditionally) with the employer. Then the job applicant could potentially lose their “applicant” status and protections provided by the Fair Chance Act.

Now the California Fair Employment and Housing Council has issued new regulations to address the potential loopholes.  As of October 1, 2020, these Fair Chance Act regulations expand the definition of “applicant.” An “applicant” now includes anyone with a conditional offer of employment, but starts working while the employer performs a post-conditional offer review of criminal history.

The state hopes this will prevent employers from avoiding Fair Chance Act requirements.

The state’s Fair Employment and Housing Council wants to help employers understand the Fair Chance Act. Take a look at the Frequently Asked Questions for additional direction.

Do you still have more questions?  Your legal counsel can help you understand how the California Fair Chance Act applies to you.

Utah Senate Bill 70: Consumer Reporting Amendments Explained

Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...

Read More

Texas Cracks Down on AI with the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act

The phrase, “don’t mess with Texas,” has taken on a whole new meaning. If you were considering using AI for business in Texas, you might want to hold...

Read More

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act Now in Effect: Details Employers Need to Know

In 2024, we covered both Minnesota’s and Rhode Island’s Data Privacy Acts. While Rhode Island’s law will not go into effect until 2026, Minnesota’s...

Read More

California Case Offers Insight on Potential Cost of Violating State Reporting Law

It may be apparent to employers that any violation of employment law can result in consequences. Often, the law spells out potential penalties....

Read More

Changes to California’s Fair Employment & Housing Act

On September 28, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 1100, an amendment toCalifornia’s Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA), introducing ...

Read More

Doe v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles: A Look at California’s MVR Reporting and Employee Law

A recent case, Doe v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, could spark further discussions on how California reports motor vehicle record checks. The...

Read More