Skip to the main content.
Featured resource

Ban the Box Guide

Our new Ban the Box Guide makes it easier than ever to decipher the patchwork of fair chance laws across the country. Check the map to quickly identify what laws apply to you.

Visit the guide ›

Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Get to know us ›

Accredited background screening solutions

PBSA Accredited

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.

Learn about our solutions ›

1 min read

Innovating “Applicant”: Updates to California’s Ban the Box Law

The state of California is a leader in the tech world. Silicon Valley is the global hub for technology innovation and startups. Many of the largest tech-based corporations even call this state home. But when it comes to ban the box laws, California was less advanced. The California Fair Chance Act has only been around for a couple of years – 20 years after the first law of its kind in Hawaii.

How the State Joined the Movement

Beginning in 2018, California-based companies with five or more employees faced new restrictions. The state placed limits on how employers can use conviction history when evaluating applicants for employment during the hiring process.

The California Fair Chance Act says that employers cannot, among other things:

  • Ask applicants about criminal records on an employment application.
  • Ask or consider criminal history of any applicant until after making a conditional employment offer.
  • Consider an applicant’s sealed, dismissed, or expunged records.
  • Consider an applicant’s arrests without convictions or referrals to pre- or post-trial diversion programs.

Employers must evaluate an applicant’s records one by one if they look at criminal history during the hiring process. The assessment should consider the:

  • Nature and gravity of the offense
  • Time that has passed
  • Nature of the job

Reshaping Definitions

The Fair Chance Act specifically protects job applicants.  California was concerned that there could be potential loopholes with the law. For example, an employer could have an applicant start work before a post-offer criminal history review. At that time, they could have an “employee” status (even conditionally) with the employer. Then the job applicant could potentially lose their “applicant” status and protections provided by the Fair Chance Act.

Now the California Fair Employment and Housing Council has issued new regulations to address the potential loopholes.  As of October 1, 2020, these Fair Chance Act regulations expand the definition of “applicant.” An “applicant” now includes anyone with a conditional offer of employment, but starts working while the employer performs a post-conditional offer review of criminal history.

The state hopes this will prevent employers from avoiding Fair Chance Act requirements.

The state’s Fair Employment and Housing Council wants to help employers understand the Fair Chance Act. Take a look at the Frequently Asked Questions for additional direction.

Do you still have more questions?  Your legal counsel can help you understand how the California Fair Chance Act applies to you.

Pennsylvania’s Criminal History Record Information Act Protects Job Applicant in Phath v. Central Transport LLC

A recent court ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld Pennsylvania’s Criminal History Record Information Act (“CHRIA”),...

Read More

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Enforcement Begins on April 1, 2026

Nearly two years after Governor Wes Moore signed the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (or MODPA), the next milestone some organizations have been...

Read More

California Finalizes Regulations on Automated Decision‑Making Technology

In November 2024, the California Privacy Protection Agency voted to proceed with outlining new rules and regulations regarding automated...

Read More

1 min read

California Case Offers Insight on Potential Cost of Violating State Reporting Law

It may be apparent to employers that any violation of employment law can result in consequences. Often, the law spells out potential penalties....

Read More

1 min read

Doe v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles: A Look at California’s MVR Reporting and Employee Law

A recent case, Doe v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, could spark further discussions on how California reports motor vehicle record checks. The...

Read More

1 min read

More California Background Report Disclosures: San Francisco

We’ve talked about how, in California, the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) and the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act...

Read More