Skip to the main content.
New! Continuous MVR monitoring
Driving record monitoring

Ongoing monitoring of driving records can help employers avoid risk and improve driver safety. Learn about the benefits of adding Verified Credentials' newest solution to your screening strategy.

Read the blog ›

Featured resource

Industry-Trends-Report-01

Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.

Download the full report ›

Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Get to know us ›

Accredited background screening solutions

Logo-PBSA-Accreditation-120x98

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.

Learn about our solutions ›

2 min read

Lowe’s Accused of FCRA Violations

Home improvement store Lowe’s is accused of violating the FCRA. The claims are part of a putative class action suit filed in the Western District of North Carolina.

According to the complaint, Lowe’s offered Anthony Hale a sales position contingent on a background check in March 2020. After the offer, Hale stopped applying for jobs and even turned down a job at another home improvement store. But in April, Hale received a text message from a Lowe’s employee that his background check didn’t pass. Hale responded to the message requesting a copy of his report. He alleges that he never received a copy of the report or the FCRA summary of rights.  The complaint alleges that:

Simply put, Defendant violated [the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)] because, before taking adverse action against the Plaintiff, it did not provide him either with a copy of his consumer report or with the summary of rights required under [the FCRA].

As we have previously discussed, the FCRA has specific requirements for employers who are thinking about taking adverse action against a candidate based, in whole or in part, on information from a background report.  This includes, but is not limited to, providing the candidate with a copy of both the background report and written summary of rights under the FCRA before taking adverse action against the candidate.

Complaint Proposes a Class

Hale’s complaint aims to highlight more than just his experience. The complaint outlines a proposed class of others impacted by Lowe’s background check procedures. The proposed class includes all consumers in the United States who over the last five years:

  • Were subject to a background check provided to Lowe’s;
  • Based, in whole or in part, on information contained in the reports, were entered into Lowe’s computer system with a code indicating they were “ineligible” for hire or continued employment; and
  • Didn’t receive a copy of their report or FCRA summary of rights from Lowe’s at least five business days before they were entered in Lowe’s computer system with a code indicating they were ineligible for hire or continued employment.

Multiple Lawsuits May Show Willfulness

The complaint claims that Defendant’s alleged violations of the FCRA were willful.

The foregoing violations were willful. Defendant acted in deliberate or reckless disregard of its obligations and the rights of Plaintiff and other Pre-Adverse Action Class Members under [the FCRA].

The complaint states that Lowe’s previously settled a nationwide class claim for alleged violations of the FCRA and should be on “heightened notice of [the FCRA’s] requirements as a result of the… litigation”.

This is the second time Defendant has been sued for nearly identical violations of the FCRA, making its FCRA violations alleged herein particularly egregious and willful.

Hale’s complaint states that this, among other things, is proof the company’s alleged violations of the FCRA were “willful.”

This case was only filed in February 2022 and is still in its early stages.  At this point in the litigation, the allegations against Lowe’s remain only allegations. Verified Credentials will continue to monitor the case status and release updates.

Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens in Prince George’s County, MD

The Prince George's Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens is a new law in Prince George's County, Maryland, designed to provide fair...

Read More

Colorado’s Clean Slate Act Goes into Effect

As of July 1, 2024, Colorado’s Clean Slate Act, or Senate Bill 22-099, is officially in effect.This comes in the wake of several other states that...

Read More

Texas Attorney General Forms Privacy Task Force

The Texas Attorney General’s office has recently announcedthe formation of a dedicated task force within its Consumer Protection Division. This task...

Read More

Rideshare Companies in the Hot Seat for Screening Practices

Transportation service giants Uber and Lyft have faced a fair share of attention related to their drivers. Buckley v. Uber claim both rideshare...

Read More

New Summary of Consumer Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act

It might be time for spring cleaning to ensure your business complies with updated background screening laws. The Consumer Financial Protection...

Read More

Lawsuit for Employment Discrimination Allegations Moves Forward

A proposed class-action lawsuit filed against Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and Cornucopia Logistics, LLC (“Defendants”) is one...

Read More