Utah Senate Bill 70: Consumer Reporting Amendments Explained
Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
|
Now offering DOT services!Get your drivers on the road quickly and meet DOT regulations. |
Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
Home improvement store Lowe’s is accused of violating the FCRA. The claims are part of a putative class action suit filed in the Western District of North Carolina.
According to the complaint, Lowe’s offered Anthony Hale a sales position contingent on a background check in March 2020. After the offer, Hale stopped applying for jobs and even turned down a job at another home improvement store. But in April, Hale received a text message from a Lowe’s employee that his background check didn’t pass. Hale responded to the message requesting a copy of his report. He alleges that he never received a copy of the report or the FCRA summary of rights. The complaint alleges that:
Simply put, Defendant violated [the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)] because, before taking adverse action against the Plaintiff, it did not provide him either with a copy of his consumer report or with the summary of rights required under [the FCRA].
As we have previously discussed, the FCRA has specific requirements for employers who are thinking about taking adverse action against a candidate based, in whole or in part, on information from a background report. This includes, but is not limited to, providing the candidate with a copy of both the background report and written summary of rights under the FCRA before taking adverse action against the candidate.
Hale’s complaint aims to highlight more than just his experience. The complaint outlines a proposed class of others impacted by Lowe’s background check procedures. The proposed class includes all consumers in the United States who over the last five years:
The complaint claims that Defendant’s alleged violations of the FCRA were willful.
The foregoing violations were willful. Defendant acted in deliberate or reckless disregard of its obligations and the rights of Plaintiff and other Pre-Adverse Action Class Members under [the FCRA].
The complaint states that Lowe’s previously settled a nationwide class claim for alleged violations of the FCRA and should be on “heightened notice of [the FCRA’s] requirements as a result of the… litigation”.
This is the second time Defendant has been sued for nearly identical violations of the FCRA, making its FCRA violations alleged herein particularly egregious and willful.
Hale’s complaint states that this, among other things, is proof the company’s alleged violations of the FCRA were “willful.”
This case was only filed in February 2022 and is still in its early stages. At this point in the litigation, the allegations against Lowe’s remain only allegations. Verified Credentials will continue to monitor the case status and release updates.
Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...
The phrase, “don’t mess with Texas,” has taken on a whole new meaning. If you were considering using AI for business in Texas, you might want to hold...
In 2024, we covered both Minnesota’s and Rhode Island’s Data Privacy Acts. While Rhode Island’s law will not go into effect until 2026, Minnesota’s...
Transportation service giants Uber and Lyft have faced a fair share of attention related to their drivers. Buckley v. Uber claim both rideshare...
If you use a third-party agency to provide you with background reports (which are also referred to as “consumer reports”), you may want to...
It might be time for spring cleaning to ensure your business complies with updated background screening laws. The Consumer Financial Protection...