Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens in Prince George’s County, MD
The Prince George's Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens is a new law in Prince George's County, Maryland, designed to provide fair...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Ongoing monitoring of driving records can help employers avoid risk and improve driver safety. Learn about the benefits of adding Verified Credentials' newest solution to your screening strategy.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
2 min read
Admin March 8, 2022
It may be apparent to employers that any violation of employment law can result in consequences. Often, the law spells out potential penalties. That’s the case with the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA).
California employers, and employers hiring people who live or work in the state, may want to work with trusted legal counsel to determine if their background screening programs need to comply with both California and federal law. What’s at risk? Employers that violate California’s ICRAA may be required to provide monetary damages.
According to state law, the cost to employers that fail to meet California’s requirements may include:
A recent order by the US District Court in the Southern District of California in the case of Garcia v. Quest Group Consulting, LLC looks at how the courts may calculate statutory damages under ICRAA.
According to the Court’s order, Garcia initially filed a claim in California state court alleging, among other things, violations of ICRAA. The court order states that Garcia’s complaint alleges that the Defendants employed Garcia as an hourly temp worker in California. Garcia further alleged that Defendants procured an investigative consumer report on her after requiring her to sign a deficient disclosure document, violating ICRAA. She seeks only the ICRAA statutory damages.
The Defendants removed the case from state court to federal court, arguing that the statutory damages Garcia is seeking exceed the required $75,000 threshold for hearing the case in federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. Garcia filed a motion with the US District Court to remand the case back to state court.
The Defendants claimed that Garcia is seeking ICRAA damages of $120,000, plus attorney fees, because Garcia alleges the Defendants violated several sections of ICRAA.
Garcia claimed that her statutory damages should be lower, below the required threshold for hearing the case in federal court. She argued that she is only entitled to one statutory penalty because the Defendants only performed one background check. Garcia claimed that the law applies the penalty per defendant, not per violation.
The US District Court ruled in favor of Garcia and remanded the case back to state court. The ruling held that “…the ICRAA penalty applies per ‘investigative consumer report’” and not for individual alleged violations.
This case gives employers a peek at how courts may calculate ICRAA statutory damages in the future. Employers should talk with their legal team to understand how this could impact them.
The Prince George's Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens is a new law in Prince George's County, Maryland, designed to provide fair...
As of July 1, 2024, Colorado’s Clean Slate Act, or Senate Bill 22-099, is officially in effect.This comes in the wake of several other states that...
The Texas Attorney General’s office has recently announcedthe formation of a dedicated task force within its Consumer Protection Division. This task...
We’ve talked about how, in California, the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) and the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act...
Last month we discussed California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) and the state-specific disclosures required by the ICRAA...
New York City has some of the country’s most complex laws for employers to follow. A case filed in the Southern District of New York alleges...