Federal Trade Commission Issues Final Rule on Noncompetes
On April 23, 2024, by a 3 to 2 vote, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a final rule to “promote competition by banning noncompetes...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Learn what social media screening is all about. See the conversation between two industry experts.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Admin October 5, 2022
Challenges to court record access in California continue to be a critical issue for the background screening industry and the employers that rely on those records.
The issue began with the May 2021 California Appellate court decision of All of Us or None v. Hamrick. In the decision, the court held that:
“…allowing the public to search an electronic [court] index by inputting an individual’s known date of birth or driver’s license number constitutes a violation of [California court rules].”
This ruling has had a drastic impact on what personal identifiers can be used to search a court’s electronic index.
State lawmakers heard the outcry from the Professional Background Screening Association (PBSA), background screeners, and others. SB-1262 was introduced and states:
“The clerk of the superior court shall keep indexes to ensure ready reference to any action or proceeding filed in the court. There shall be separate indexes of plaintiffs and defendants in civil actions and defendants in criminal actions… Publicly accessible electronic indexes of defendants in criminal cases shall permit searches and filtering of results based on a defendant’s driver’s license number or date of birth, or both.”
On May 24, 2022, the bill passed the state Senate with a vote of 37-0. The state Assembly had little opposition to the bill, passing it with a 53-9 vote on August 31, 2022. It was then sent to California Governor Gavin Newsome for signature.
Governor Newsome vetoed the bill on September 29, 2022. At this time, the vetoed bill has been returned to the California Senate. The PBSA stated they,
“…will be regrouping with allies to determine what our next and best possible options are at this stage.”
Verified Credentials will continue to monitor the progress in California and provide updates. Employers may want to work with their legal team to determine the best approach for screening candidates with a history in the state of California.
On April 23, 2024, by a 3 to 2 vote, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a final rule to “promote competition by banning noncompetes...
Los Angeles County has introduced a new Fair Chance Ordinance for employers, effective September 3, 2024. Previously, we tracked other Fair Chance...
Florida is set to implement new legislation that significantly expands the scope of background screening for healthcare workers. Currently, only...
3 min read
Employers hoping to learn detailed information about their candidates may want to read on. You may know the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)...
1 min read
A bill passed by the California legislature could mean good news for those that use public records from the state’s court system. Reliable access to...
3 min read
We have previously reported on multiple recently enacted Ban the Box laws, both at the state and municipal levels. As you may know, Ban the Box laws...