Recent Ruling in Minnesota Shows That Tort Can Apply to Hiring Contractors
When it comes to screening contractors in Minnesota, some organizations may have operated under the belief that they had little or no liability when...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Ongoing monitoring of driving records can help employers avoid risk and improve driver safety. Learn about the benefits of adding Verified Credentials' newest solution to your screening strategy.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
Following the lead of some other state employer restrictions we have previously discussed, such as California’s AB-2188 and D.C.’s Cannabis Protection Act, Minnesota has now amended its Consumable Products Act and Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act to protect off-duty cannabis use.
Minnesota’s amendment includes updates to Minnesota’s drug testing scheme to protect off-duty cannabis use took effect on August 1, 2023, as well as updates to the Minnesota Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act by excluding cannabis from the definition of “drug,” among other things.
Effective August 1, 2023, and subject to certain exceptions, it is generally unlawful for a Minnesota employer to:
Minnesota employers are not restricted from regulating off-duty cannabis use in all circumstances under the new amendment. The amendments to Minnesota’s drug testing scheme are intended to protect employees. The changes are not intended to prohibit employers from taking necessary lawful action when employees are reasonably suspected of possessing or using cannabis during work hours or on workplace premises.
Some situations allow lawful regulation for hiring based on cannabis use, depending on the role of the job and the context defined by the amendment. Exceptions to the cannabis testing prohibitions include hiring for the following positions:
Additionally, similar to California’s AB-2188, Minnesota’s amendment does not apply to permitting any employees to possess, use, or be impaired by cannabis while on the job, as outlined below.
An employer may request or require an employee to undergo cannabis testing and drug and alcohol testing if the employer has a reasonable suspicion that the employee:
(1) is under the influence of drugs or alcohol;
(2) has violated the employer’s written work rules prohibiting the use, possession, sale, or transfer of drugs or alcohol, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products while the employee is working or while the employee is on the employer’s premises or operating the employer’s vehicle, machinery, or equipment, provided the work rules are in writing and contained in the employer’s written cannabis testing or drug and alcohol testing policy;
(3) has sustained a personal injury, as that term is defined in section 176.011, subdivision 16, or has caused another employee to sustain a personal injury; or
(4) has caused a work-related accident or was operating or helping to operate machinery, equipment, or vehicles involved in a work-related accident.
To read the complete list of restrictions and employee protections related to the amendment to Minnesota’s drug testing scheme, take a closer look here.
Employers in Minnesota may want to review these changes to ensure hiring processes and employer action follow the guidelines laid out in the recent amendments. Similar laws could affect others outside of Minnesota. Consult your legal team to understand how this might require changing your current drug testing policy.
When it comes to screening contractors in Minnesota, some organizations may have operated under the belief that they had little or no liability when...
Illinois first included language addressing the use of E-Verify in the Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act in 2008, with an amendment in 2010....
In June 2023, the Oregon Legislature passed Senate Bill 619, also known as the Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA). The law took effect on July 1,...
When it comes to screening contractors in Minnesota, some organizations may have operated under the belief that they had little or no liability when...
A recent court decision has changed how Minnesota courts analyze whether municipalities may be liable for their hiring decisions—emphasizing that...
Effective January 1, 2024, California has new laws designed to protect the rights of cannabis users in the workplace. These laws aim to prevent...