Recent Ruling in Minnesota Shows That Tort Can Apply to Hiring Contractors
When it comes to screening contractors in Minnesota, some organizations may have operated under the belief that they had little or no liability when...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Ongoing monitoring of driving records can help employers avoid risk and improve driver safety. Learn about the benefits of adding Verified Credentials' newest solution to your screening strategy.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Verified Credentials Sep 28, 2023 12:00:00 AM
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals or Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Kaiser”) have agreed to pay more than $4 million as part of a settlement resolving a class action lawsuit claiming a failure to use Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)-compliant disclosure forms prior to obtaining background checks for employment purposes. Kaiser denies wrongdoing and denies violating applicable law.
Sanders v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals is one of the latest class action lawsuits related to alleged failure to provide proper disclosures when running background checks on candidates. We recently covered similar allegations, such as Melikyan v. Amazon in 2021 and Nunley v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation in 2022.
Sanders (“Plaintiff”), in a recent class action lawsuit, alleged that Kaiser (“Defendants”) “acquired consumer, investigative consumer, and/or consumer credit reports to conduct background checks on Plaintiff and other prospective current and former applicants for employment purposes without providing proper disclosures and obtaining proper authorization.” Plaintiff claimed that Kaiser allegedly violated the following laws:
Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”);
California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”);
California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”); and
California Unfair Competition Law (“CUCL”).
Kaiser denies that it violated the above laws but has agreed to the settlement. The final hearing was scheduled to be held on September 21, 2023.
Under the FCRA, a person who obtains a consumer report for employment purposes must, in “a clear and conspicuous disclosure” and “in a document that consists solely of the disclosure,” notify the consumer in writing that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes. The consumer also must authorize the procurement of the report by the person before the person procures such report.
Employers should consult with their legal counsel to ensure their background screening practices comply with the FCRA and other applicable laws.
When it comes to screening contractors in Minnesota, some organizations may have operated under the belief that they had little or no liability when...
Illinois first included language addressing the use of E-Verify in the Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act in 2008, with an amendment in 2010....
In June 2023, the Oregon Legislature passed Senate Bill 619, also known as the Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA). The law took effect on July 1,...
In January, Fulton County - Georgia’s most populous county that includes the city of Atlanta - experienced a cyber incident that significantly...
Due to a security incident in October 2023, the Kansas judicial branch has temporarily shut down its electronic information systems. Public...
The Prince George's Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens is a new law in Prince George's County, Maryland, designed to provide fair...