Philadelphia’s Ban the Box Amendments: 5 Key Changes Employers Need to Know
Philadelphia’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards (also known as the Fair Chance Hiring Law or “ban the box” ordinance) first went into effect...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
|
|
Now offering DOT services!Get your drivers on the road quickly and meet DOT regulations. |
Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Verified Credentials Sep 28, 2023 12:00:00 AM
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals or Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Kaiser”) have agreed to pay more than $4 million as part of a settlement resolving a class action lawsuit claiming a failure to use Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)-compliant disclosure forms prior to obtaining background checks for employment purposes. Kaiser denies wrongdoing and denies violating applicable law.
Sanders v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals is one of the latest class action lawsuits related to alleged failure to provide proper disclosures when running background checks on candidates. We recently covered similar allegations, such as Melikyan v. Amazon in 2021 and Nunley v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation in 2022.
Sanders (“Plaintiff”), in a recent class action lawsuit, alleged that Kaiser (“Defendants”) “acquired consumer, investigative consumer, and/or consumer credit reports to conduct background checks on Plaintiff and other prospective current and former applicants for employment purposes without providing proper disclosures and obtaining proper authorization.” Plaintiff claimed that Kaiser allegedly violated the following laws:
Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”);
California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”);
California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”); and
California Unfair Competition Law (“CUCL”).
Kaiser denies that it violated the above laws but has agreed to the settlement. The final hearing was scheduled to be held on September 21, 2023.
Under the FCRA, a person who obtains a consumer report for employment purposes must, in “a clear and conspicuous disclosure” and “in a document that consists solely of the disclosure,” notify the consumer in writing that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes. The consumer also must authorize the procurement of the report by the person before the person procures such report.
Employers should consult with their legal counsel to ensure their background screening practices comply with the FCRA and other applicable laws.
Philadelphia’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards (also known as the Fair Chance Hiring Law or “ban the box” ordinance) first went into effect...
As part of E-Verify’s annual record disposal process of records that are 10 years or older, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) ...
The way states regulate AI and automated decision-making technology for businesses as we approach 2026 appears to be in flux. While Colorado was one...
In January, Fulton County - Georgia’s most populous county that includes the city of Atlanta - experienced a cyber incident that significantly...
Due to a security incident in October 2023, the Kansas judicial branch has temporarily shut down its electronic information systems. Public...
The Prince George's Employment Fairness Act for Returning Citizens is a new law in Prince George's County, Maryland, designed to provide fair...