Federal Trade Commission Issues Final Rule on Noncompetes
On April 23, 2024, by a 3 to 2 vote, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a final rule to “promote competition by banning noncompetes...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
Learn what social media screening is all about. See the conversation between two industry experts.
Learn the latest trends in employment background checks. This report uses real-life usage data to uncover how employers are screening across industries.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Verified Credentials September 28, 2023
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals or Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Kaiser”) have agreed to pay more than $4 million as part of a settlement resolving a class action lawsuit claiming a failure to use Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)-compliant disclosure forms prior to obtaining background checks for employment purposes. Kaiser denies wrongdoing and denies violating applicable law.
Sanders v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals is one of the latest class action lawsuits related to alleged failure to provide proper disclosures when running background checks on candidates. We recently covered similar allegations, such as Melikyan v. Amazon in 2021 and Nunley v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation in 2022.
Sanders (“Plaintiff”), in a recent class action lawsuit, alleged that Kaiser (“Defendants”) “acquired consumer, investigative consumer, and/or consumer credit reports to conduct background checks on Plaintiff and other prospective current and former applicants for employment purposes without providing proper disclosures and obtaining proper authorization.” Plaintiff claimed that Kaiser allegedly violated the following laws:
Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”);
California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”);
California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”); and
California Unfair Competition Law (“CUCL”).
Kaiser denies that it violated the above laws but has agreed to the settlement. The final hearing was scheduled to be held on September 21, 2023.
Under the FCRA, a person who obtains a consumer report for employment purposes must, in “a clear and conspicuous disclosure” and “in a document that consists solely of the disclosure,” notify the consumer in writing that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes. The consumer also must authorize the procurement of the report by the person before the person procures such report.
Employers should consult with their legal counsel to ensure their background screening practices comply with the FCRA and other applicable laws.
On April 23, 2024, by a 3 to 2 vote, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a final rule to “promote competition by banning noncompetes...
Los Angeles County has introduced a new Fair Chance Ordinance for employers, effective September 3, 2024. Previously, we tracked other Fair Chance...
Florida is set to implement new legislation that significantly expands the scope of background screening for healthcare workers. Currently, only...
2 min read
If you use background reports for employment purposes, you are probably well-versed in the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
2 min read
Amazon is busy this time of year. But a recent court filing may leave it busier than usual. A prior Amazon employee claims the retailer violated a...
2 min read
Certain industries require mandatory background checks of employees according to law. Florida is looking to add to that list apartment employees. A...