Utah Senate Bill 70: Consumer Reporting Amendments Explained
Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...
With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.
|
Now offering DOT services!Get your drivers on the road quickly and meet DOT regulations. |
Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.
Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.
Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.
1 min read
Verified Credentials Sep 16, 2020 12:00:00 AM
Retail stores are no strangers to matters of civil rights. For decades, civil rights laws have helped keep retailers accountable for consumers’ civil rights complaints. Anti-discrimination protections extend not just to the shoppers, though. They reach essential workers keeping the doors open, too. How retailers hire cashiers, store clerks, backroom dock workers and more can be subject to those protections. Let’s revisit the discrimination complaint regarding Macy’s hiring practices as it draws to a close.
Last year a class-action lawsuit was brought against Macy’s. (To read our industry note about this, click here.) The complaint alleged that the company improperly used background report information to discriminate against its applicants and employees. The complaint included alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York City Human Rights Law.
There has been a new development in the litigation. Macy’s and the plaintiffs have reached a proposed settlement. If approved, Macy’s must:
Read the full proposed settlement here.
The proposed settlement has not been finalized. It will take effect when approved by the court.
This case is a reminder of how important legal compliance is when conducting background checks. It’s not just for big box stores. You should keep in mind background check laws at the federal, state, and local level. Also keep anti-discrimination laws in mind when taking inventory of your background check programs.
It’s a lot of laws to remember. What’s the best way to make sure your background screening program maintains compliance with all applicable laws? You should always consult with your legal counsel.
Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...
The phrase, “don’t mess with Texas,” has taken on a whole new meaning. If you were considering using AI for business in Texas, you might want to hold...
In 2024, we covered both Minnesota’s and Rhode Island’s Data Privacy Acts. While Rhode Island’s law will not go into effect until 2026, Minnesota’s...
When completing background checks, ensuring compliance with federal, state, and local consumer reporting laws is only one consideration for an...
The laws around employment background reports are vast. If you use background reports, you probably take care to follow all applicable federal,...
A proposed class-action lawsuit filed against Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and Cornucopia Logistics, LLC (“Defendants”) is one...