Skip to the main content.
Making screening easy for candidates

CVC - Mega Menu-01

With Verified Credentials' mobile-first candidate experience, you meet candidates where it's most convenient. Learn how easy we make it.

See how it works ›

Featured resource

Adverse Action Guide_Menu

Gain clarity about your compliance responsibilities with our new Adverse Action Guide! Use the interactive map to learn what regulations apply in your area.

Visit the guide ›

Verified Credentials is a leading background screening company. Since 1984, we’ve helped validate and secure relationships through the use of our comprehensive screening solutions. We offer a wide variety of background checks, verifications, and innovative screening tools.

Get to know us ›

Accredited background screening solutions

Logo-PBSA-Accreditation-120x98

Our accreditation confirms that our policies, processes, and employee training meet rigorous industry compliance standards.

Learn about our solutions ›

1 min read

Macy’s Learns What’s in Store for Employers Who Engage in Discriminatory Employment Practices Using Background Report Information

Retail stores are no strangers to matters of civil rights. For decades, civil rights laws have helped keep retailers accountable for consumers’ civil rights complaints. Anti-discrimination protections extend not just to the shoppers, though. They reach essential workers keeping the doors open, too. How retailers hire cashiers, store clerks, backroom dock workers and more can be subject to those protections. Let’s revisit the discrimination complaint regarding Macy’s hiring practices as it draws to a close.

Inventory of Claims & (Proposed) Resolutions

Last year a class-action lawsuit was brought against Macy’s.  (To read our industry note about this, click here.)  The complaint alleged that the company improperly used background report information to discriminate against its applicants and employees. The complaint included alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York City Human Rights Law.

There has been a new development in the litigation.  Macy’s and the plaintiffs have reached a proposed settlement.  If approved, Macy’s must:

  • Change its applications. Its applications will not be able to mention the requirement for a background check for applicants in New York City.
  • Hire a consultant to review its background check procedures in New York City. The consultant will review them in light of New York laws and Title VII.  Macy’s will make changes to its background check procedures in New York City based on the consultant’s advice.  Macy’s must report changes made to those background check procedures to plaintiffs’ counsel.
  • Maintain any changes made to the background check procedures for a minimum of two years.
  • Pay a monetary settlement of $1.8 million.


Read the full proposed settlement here.

The proposed settlement has not been finalized.  It will take effect when approved by the court.

Keeping Stock of Regulations

This case is a reminder of how important legal compliance is when conducting background checks. It’s not just for big box stores. You should keep in mind background check laws at the federal, state, and local level.  Also keep anti-discrimination laws in mind when taking inventory of your background check programs.

It’s a lot of laws to remember.  What’s the best way to make sure your background screening program maintains compliance with all applicable laws? You should always consult with your legal counsel.

Utah Senate Bill 70: Consumer Reporting Amendments Explained

Utah joined the list of states in 2025 that have enacted legislation regulating what information can be reported to organizations requesting...

Read More

Texas Cracks Down on AI with the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act

The phrase, “don’t mess with Texas,” has taken on a whole new meaning. If you were considering using AI for business in Texas, you might want to hold...

Read More

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act Now in Effect: Details Employers Need to Know

In 2024, we covered both Minnesota’s and Rhode Island’s Data Privacy Acts. While Rhode Island’s law will not go into effect until 2026, Minnesota’s...

Read More

Improper Use? Macy’s Faces Allegations of Discrimination in Background Check Policies

When completing background checks, ensuring compliance with federal, state, and local consumer reporting laws is only one consideration for an...

Read More

Employment Discrimination Based on Criminal History: A Cautionary Tale

The laws around employment background reports are vast. If you use background reports, you probably take care to follow all applicable federal,...

Read More

Lawsuit for Employment Discrimination Allegations Moves Forward

A proposed class-action lawsuit filed against Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and Cornucopia Logistics, LLC (“Defendants”) is one...

Read More